Fauxcahontas on the warpath.

Fauxcahontas on the warpath. And out for all to see during the confirmation hearing of Dr. Ben Carson for the head of Housing and Urban Development.  The transcript below is from

English: Elizabeth Warren speaking at March 29...

English: Elizabeth Warren speaking at March 29, 2010, at the Women in Finance symposium. Warren was part of a five-woman panel discussion. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

the hearing.  What I find amazing is that with a reported budget of $32.6 Billion (2014), how Warren determines that Carson can keep track of each and every penny, or as the conversation went $10.

Carson was gracious and level in his answers, and yet Warren continued with the minutia.  It is apparent that she has no grasp of the job requirements and duties of a Presidential Cabinet appointee.

mr. chairman and congratulations on your
new role as chair of this committee i’m
looking forward to working with you as
well as with six new members of our
committee dr. Carson thank you for being
here thank you
before we get into some of the questions
that are raised in my letter to you
earlier this week I just want to get an
answer to I think that’s simple
yes-or-no question if you are confirmed
to lead HUD you’ll be responsible for
issuing billions of dollars in grants
and loans to help develop housing and
provide a lot of housing related
services now housing development is an
area in which president elect Trump and
his family have significant business
interests can you assure me that not a
single taxpayer dollar that you give out
will financially benefit the
president-elect or his family
well senator I was worried that you
wouldn’t get back thank you for coming
back I’m back I can assure you that the
things that i do are driven by sense of
morals and values and therefore I will
absolutely not play favorites for anyone
dr. Carson at let me stop right there I
i’m actually trying to ask a more
pointed question and it’s not about your
good faith that’s not my concern
my concern is whether or not among the
billions of dollars that you will be
responsible for handing out in grants
and loans can you just assuring us that
not one dollar will go to benefit either
the president-elect or his family
it will not be my intention to do
anything I could to benefit any any
American I understand that’s for all
Americans everything that we do
do I take that to mean that you may
manage programs that will significantly
benefit the president-elect you can
get the main that I will manage things
in a way that benefits the American
people that is going to be the goal to
the best you understand it if there
happens to be an extraordinarily good
program that’s working for millions of
people and it turns out that that that
someone that you’re targeting is going
to gain you know ten dollars from it
am I going to say no the rest of you
Americans can’t have it
I think logic and common sense probably
would be the best way
yeah although we do have a problem here
and I appreciate your good faith in this
and I do dr. Carson the problem is that
you can assure is that HUD money out of
ten dollar varieties but of
multimillion-dollar varieties will not
end up in the president elects pockets
and the reason you can’t assurance of
that is because the president-elect is
hiding his family’s business interests
from you from me from the rest of
America and this just highlights the
absurdity and the danger of the
president elects refusal to put his
assets in a true blind trust he knows he
the president like knows what will
benefit him and his family financially
but the public doesn’t which means he
can divert taxpayer money into his own
pockets without anyone knowing about it
the only way that the American people
can know that the president is working
in their best interests and not in his
own is if he divest and puts his assets
in a true blind trust transferring his
holdings to his children does nothing as
the head of the nonpartisan ethics
committee said just last night since the
president-elect refuses to address this
voluntarily we need to pass the
presidential conflicts of interest act
that i introduced with more than 20 of
my colleagues which would require him to
do so
so with the time i have less i just want
to follow up very quickly on a letter
that I sent to you earlier this week and
we talked about in my artists and I
appreciated that
but and I appreciated it to as you know
more than 7 million children rely on HUD
for housing seven million people many of
them are children veterans people with
um for many of these people had is the
difference between a stable home and
life out on the streets but one major
problem that we talked about his lead
exposure and according to the most
recent HUD study 62,000 public housing
units nearly six percent of our total
public housing stock are in need of lead
abatement you are highly accomplished
dr. we spoke at length about the
implications of lead and lead poisoning
our children can I just ask you to
commit today that you will make sure
that HUD resources are dedicated to
dramatically reducing the number of
public housing units where LED is a
problem i can assure you that I will
very much be working with you on that
310,000 cases right now children each of
which cost us enormous amounts money i
don’t think people even calculate that
and to that when we’re talking about
so yes I will be very vigorous in that
area i I’ve airy much appreciate it
um this is a particular problem for us
in the northeast is a particular problem
in boston where housing stock is old
route and it is absolutely critical that
we get the lead out of these housing
units and that our children have a
chance to grow up without being injured
by our own negligence i look forward to
working with thank you for your
leadership and angry
thank you dr. Carson senator Heller
Send to Kindle

Tuesday Thoughts…

Yes it’s Tuesday and nearly Christmas.  The ground here is covered with snow and a white

Leading the 2001 Christmas Pageant of Peace pr...

Leading the 2001 Christmas Pageant of Peace program, President George W. Bush and Mrs. Laura Bush preside over the lighting ceremonies for the National Christmas Tree, a 40-foot Colorado blue spruce. White House photo by Susan Sterner. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Christmas is upon us.  Some thoughts as Christmas is upon us and the year is winding down.

The recent Presidential Election is now well in our rear view mirror and yesterday the designated electors from all 50 states voted and Donald J.Trump is now designated as our 45th President.  I’m hopeful that we, as a country can now begin to move forward into 2017.

That being said, I’m not so sure that moving forward is going to be so easily accomplished.  As I read news stories and postings on the profusion of social media sites I am both concerned, and confused.

There continues to be what appears to be a great deal of hate for the newly elected president.  Possibly not for him specifically and rather for the overall process which brought him to his newfound position.  I can only speak for myself in this matter, and back in 2008 and 2012 my choice for president didn’t win either year.  Those of my family and close friends while disappointed certainly didn’t display any of the outbursts which have been reported over the past few weeks.

No one went to the electoral college gathering in Colorado to shout furious rhetoric while acting like some whiny, bad-tempered child.  We were not pleased with the outcome of the vote and moved on.  We were wise enough to know that the Republican Party had not put forth a quality candidate.  Nor had that candidate connected with the voters.

Back to current events, the Republican candidate connected with his voting base and the Democrat, Hillary Clinton didn’t.  I’m certain that plenty of reviews and dissection of the 2016 Presidential Election will look at everything but how the candidate connected with their respective voters.

Now, six weeks after the election, there continue to be those statist democrats who are filled with and spew nothing but ungracious, scathing and vile sputum at one and all.  I’ll assert that this is a contributing basis for the divide in this country.  With the statist left continuing to act like the child who didn’t get their way, nothing will be resolved.  Time to man up Democrats.

Thanks for reading.  If you’d like to contribute to this website and our narrative here is a good and current PayPal link.

Send to Kindle

Update: Wisconsin Presidential Election Recount.

The Jill Stein and Hillary Clinton Election recount here in Wisconsin is on fire.


Send to Kindle

Voting for Hillary?

Voting for Hillary?  Are you really?  I’m a horrible judge of character given your inability to make hillary-for-prisonreasonable judgments given the preponderance of facts of her guilt.

Please take a look at the following – IS HILLARY GUILTY?

It takes Bill Whittle 93 seconds to show Hillary Clinton guilty of violating three separate Federal Statutes. It takes another three minutes to explain why she and Obama simply DO NOT CARE.

Ok, I waited for the 4:52 for you to come back.  Bill is short and to the point.  Are you telling me that you’re still voting for Hillary, who has violated the espionage act and other federal statutes?  I thought you were smarter than that.

Now here is a bit longer video, 30 minutes of good facts – The Truth About The Hillary Clinton FBI Investigation and James Comey’s Announcement

Stefan Molyneux lays out with links, documented misdeeds, corruption and of course Hillary lies about just about everything surrounding the current election process.

Over the past month, I’ve seen many interesting posts.  These posts have been from individuals who are well known for their areas of expertise.  These are individuals whose postings I read for their musings and pontifications on a variety of subjects and are known and apparently well respected throughout the internet.

When it comes to their outlook and statements and writings about the current election, it becomes flagrantly obvious that these individuals haven’t a modicum of knowledge about the current political climate.  Now, everyone is entitled to their own opinions on anything.  I don’t necessarily have to agree with said individuals and I won’t.  I also ignore the trolls, not the Icelandic Christmas boys, who are at a complete loss to have a reasoned conversation about the political subject.

I do find it interesting that of the thousands of emails released documenting the multitude of violations and lies and corruption by Hillary and her menagerie, there has been no defense that any what has been brought to light is not true.

Tomorrow we get to go vote and all of the past 16 months of kerfuffle will be behind us.  I can certainly hope!  Let me know what you think, and please comment and contribute.


Send to Kindle

If you don’t want the FBI involved…

If you don’t want the FBI involved…


Why is this concept so strange and challenging for the statist left to comprehend?

Continue to assist us in our journey to Fight Back against the statist media and their failing false narrative.

Send to Kindle

Warning to Hillary Clinton

Warning to Hillary Clinton, from WikiLeaks, the Podesta emails.

English: John Podesta in 2010.

English: John Podesta in 2010. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Warning to Hillary Clinton

Send to Kindle

Seven topics for discussion on a Saturday before the election.

Seven topics for discussion on a Saturday before the election.  Scanning the news this breaking-newsmorning these eight topics caught my eye.  Feel free to discuss amongst yourselves and comment below as you see fit.  And in no particular order lets get started.

Bloody October Pushes Chicago Past 600 Homicides.

 Wait, I thought Chicago was to be the poster city for all that was well and good with gun control?  Here is your real world example of how draconian gun laws impact the Second City and its residents.  And to add insult to injury, no one on the statist left gives a scintilla of acknowledgement to what is transpiring in Chicago.

Susan Sarandon explains why she’s not backing Hillary Clinton: ‘I don’t vote with my vagina’

I’m sure we’re all glad as it would make for a rather messy voting booth.

Democrats Don’t Have A Plan If Donald Trump Is Elected – BuzzFeed News

And we’re surprised about this why?  The statist democrats assume that Hillary Clinton (felon) will be summarily handed the presidency on November 8th and then coronated on the 20th of January 2017.  Now it is obvious that they are entirely consumed with Wikileaks 1-28 and the rest of the overflow of our ability to peek behind the curtain of what goes on and has gone on over the past years.  As I’ve previously written, why only two individuals have suffered any consequences from what we now know is baffling

Why Aren’t There More Gay Baseball Players?.

Given the historic nature of the recent end of the 2016 World Series,  this is the topic on the mind of those who follow baseball?  Ok, so it’s not any of the bizarre and lurid goings on of the soon to be wrapped up Presidential Election.

 Being a Journalism School graduate this is particularly disturbing.  Whatever happened to the 5 W’s and H that were taught when I was in class?  Journalism within the statist media has lost its way.
Pay for play, slush fund while working as a government employee?   There is so much wrong with this revelation that it is hard to know where to begin. Lets start with the fact that the gift was never reported as required.

The Case for and Against Daylight Saving Time.

It is that time of year once again to go through this exercise.  The sun will be up an hour earlier on Sunday and will set sometime in the middle of the afternoon.  I’ll excuse any lateness from anyone.


Send to Kindle


WIKILEAKS 1-25 BREAKING NEWS: Michelle Obama Deletes Clinton Tweets. DOJ Dinner With Podesta.  There is a great amount of resource information here.  A HT and shout out to H.A. Goodman.

Note that in the youtube.com link, H.A. Goodman provides lots of links and resources.

Continue to assist us to Fight Back.

Send to Kindle

6 Occurrences of Voter Fraud.

6 occurrences of Voter Fraud?  But wait, Paul, that’s not all that bad for a Presidential

English: A voter returns his vote-by-mail ball...

English: A voter returns his vote-by-mail ballot in the 2006 General elections in Lane County, Oregon. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

election.  Well, these are six occurrences reporting voter fraud across the country.  There are likely as many opinions about the need or lack of need for Voter ID as there are voters in the country.

Here in Wisconsin the requirements are –

  1. 1 of 3
    In person
    By mail
    Who can vote by mail

    All voters registered in Wisconsin can vote by mail

    1. Get your absentee ballot application

    Download and print the absentee ballot application

    2. Fill out the form

    Step 1 · Provide your municipality and county

    Step 2 · Provide your name, birthday, and contact information

    Step 3 · Provide your address


    3. Submit the form

    Mail the signed and completed form to your Municipal Clerk’s office so it’s received by 5 PM on Nov 3

    Attach a copy of accepted ID, if required

    4. Vote
    • Once you receive your ballot, follow the instructions to fill out the ballot and return envelope
    • Your ballot must be received by 8 PM on Election Day, Nov 8
    • Check the status of your ballot on myvote.wi.gov
    ID requirements

    Attach a copy to your mail ballot application or bring one of the following IDs with you to vote:

    • A Wisconsin DOT-issued driver license with photo (or without photo if you have a religious exemption)
    • A Wisconsin DOT-issued ID card with photo (or without photo if you have a religious exemption)
    • Military ID card
    • A US passport


2 of 3

  • Live at a Wisconsin address by Oct 29
  • Be registered to vote in Wisconsin or register to vote at the polls on Election Day. Check if you’re registered to vote.
  • Be a US citizen


ID requirements

Attach a copy to your mail ballot application or bring one of the following IDs with you to vote:

  1. A Wisconsin DOT-issued driver license with photo (or without photo if you have a religious exemption)
  2. A Wisconsin DOT-issued ID card with photo (or without photo if you have a religious exemption)
  3. Military ID card
  4. A US passport

Many on the statist left continue to clamor that the requirement to show a photo ID when casting a vote in any election is unfair,suppressive of voters and racist.  Why you wouldn’t want to know who is voting and if they are a citizen and allowed to vote, is baffling to me.  Now, despite the statist left and their insistence of their being no voter fraud here are some recent occurrences.

These are but six instances reported by local news sources across the country.  How the statist left can continue to not be cognizant that there is voter fraud across the country is amazingly disingenuous.

It is instances such as these six that enroll us in the cause to continue to Fight Back against the statist media and their complicit  and coerced stories.

Send to Kindle

5 Reasons not to vote for Hillary.

5 reasons not to vote for Hillary, and your asking, wait, what, only five?  Yes, there are

English: Ballot Box showing preferential voting

English: Ballot Box showing preferential voting (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

numerous more than five reasons and these are five I’ve observed.

  1.  The sale of U.S uranium reserves.  While Secretary of State, Hillary allowed the sale, and also benefited from this transaction with a $2.35 million dollar donation to the Clinton Foundation.  Where has the statist media been to cover this story and urge for a special prosecutor?
  2. Benghazi.  Unless you’ve been in a coma or living under a rock during the past four years we’ve all seen the infamous,  …”what difference does it make.” video. Really Hillary?  Four American citizens, including our, Ambassador, were attacked and died on your watch as Secretary of State.  You have little if any respect for your fellow Americans lives. You then compounded the issue by lying to the American people and the families of the dead heroes as to the reasons for the incident.
  3. The Clinton Foundation.  While sounding noble and for the common good, it is nothing of the sort.  Many charities/foundations often contribute 80% or more of their expenses/donations to their causes, The Clinton Foundation in 2014 contributed an astounding 5.7% of their expenses/donations to charitable grants.  These minuscule contributions to charitable causes have many shouting swindle.  The axiom of, follow the money, is relevant here.
  4. Bill Clinton.  There are current voters of a certain age who don’t know of, or have failed to pay attention to Hillary’s husband.  These folks have no memory of the Clinton (Bill) years in the White House.  To state the obvious that Bill is a serial philanderer and rapist is likely being kind.  Are we so calloused as to want someone of his ilk returning to the White House?
  5. Violation of the Espionage Act.  There are an abundance and preponderance of verified evidence that Hillary violated 18 U.S.C. 793 – GATHERING, TRANSMITTING OR LOSING DEFENSE INFORMATION.  In conjunction with this, her lying to congress and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are cause to have her in prison.

While this is by no means a complete list, it is a list of things that are unrefutable.  Hillary has no business being anywhere near the White House.  She also has absolutely disqualified herself from running for the office of President.  It is instances such as these five that enroll us in the cause to continue to Fight Back against the statist media and their complicit  and coerced stories.

Send to Kindle
Show Buttons
Hide Buttons