Fauxcahontas on the warpath.

Fauxcahontas on the warpath. And out for all to see during the confirmation hearing of Dr. Ben Carson for the head of Housing and Urban Development.  The transcript below is from

English: Elizabeth Warren speaking at March 29...

English: Elizabeth Warren speaking at March 29, 2010, at the Women in Finance symposium. Warren was part of a five-woman panel discussion. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

the hearing.  What I find amazing is that with a reported budget of $32.6 Billion (2014), how Warren determines that Carson can keep track of each and every penny, or as the conversation went $10.

Carson was gracious and level in his answers, and yet Warren continued with the minutia.  It is apparent that she has no grasp of the job requirements and duties of a Presidential Cabinet appointee.

mr. chairman and congratulations on your
0:01
new role as chair of this committee i’m
0:04
looking forward to working with you as
0:05
well as with six new members of our
0:07
committee dr. Carson thank you for being
0:10
here thank you
0:11
before we get into some of the questions
0:12
that are raised in my letter to you
0:14
earlier this week I just want to get an
0:16
answer to I think that’s simple
0:18
yes-or-no question if you are confirmed
0:22
to lead HUD you’ll be responsible for
0:25
issuing billions of dollars in grants
0:29
and loans to help develop housing and
0:32
provide a lot of housing related
0:33
services now housing development is an
0:37
area in which president elect Trump and
0:40
his family have significant business
0:43
interests can you assure me that not a
0:47
single taxpayer dollar that you give out
0:50
will financially benefit the
0:53
president-elect or his family
0:55
well senator I was worried that you
1:00
wouldn’t get back thank you for coming
1:01
back I’m back I can assure you that the
1:12
things that i do are driven by sense of
1:16
morals and values and therefore I will
1:20
absolutely not play favorites for anyone
1:24
dr. Carson at let me stop right there I
1:27
i’m actually trying to ask a more
1:29
pointed question and it’s not about your
1:32
good faith that’s not my concern
1:34
my concern is whether or not among the
1:38
billions of dollars that you will be
1:40
responsible for handing out in grants
1:43
and loans can you just assuring us that
1:46
not one dollar will go to benefit either
1:51
the president-elect or his family
1:54
it will not be my intention to do
1:56
anything I could to benefit any any
2:00
American I understand that’s for all
2:03
Americans everything that we do
2:05
do I take that to mean that you may
2:07
manage programs that will significantly
2:10
benefit the president-elect you can
2:13
get the main that I will manage things
2:16
in a way that benefits the American
2:18
people that is going to be the goal to
2:21
the best you understand it if there
2:24
happens to be an extraordinarily good
2:27
program that’s working for millions of
2:29
people and it turns out that that that
2:32
someone that you’re targeting is going
2:34
to gain you know ten dollars from it
2:37
am I going to say no the rest of you
2:39
Americans can’t have it
2:40
I think logic and common sense probably
2:43
would be the best way
2:45
yeah although we do have a problem here
2:47
and I appreciate your good faith in this
2:49
and I do dr. Carson the problem is that
2:52
you can assure is that HUD money out of
2:56
ten dollar varieties but of
2:58
multimillion-dollar varieties will not
3:01
end up in the president elects pockets
3:03
and the reason you can’t assurance of
3:05
that is because the president-elect is
3:09
hiding his family’s business interests
3:12
from you from me from the rest of
3:14
America and this just highlights the
3:17
absurdity and the danger of the
3:20
president elects refusal to put his
3:23
assets in a true blind trust he knows he
3:28
the president like knows what will
3:30
benefit him and his family financially
3:33
but the public doesn’t which means he
3:36
can divert taxpayer money into his own
3:39
pockets without anyone knowing about it
3:41
the only way that the American people
3:44
can know that the president is working
3:45
in their best interests and not in his
3:48
own is if he divest and puts his assets
3:52
in a true blind trust transferring his
3:55
holdings to his children does nothing as
3:58
the head of the nonpartisan ethics
4:00
committee said just last night since the
4:03
president-elect refuses to address this
4:05
voluntarily we need to pass the
4:08
presidential conflicts of interest act
4:10
that i introduced with more than 20 of
4:12
my colleagues which would require him to
4:15
do so
4:16
so with the time i have less i just want
4:20
to follow up very quickly on a letter
4:22
that I sent to you earlier this week and
4:24
we talked about in my artists and I
4:26
appreciated that
4:27
but and I appreciated it to as you know
4:30
more than 7 million children rely on HUD
4:32
for housing seven million people many of
4:35
them are children veterans people with
4:37
disabilities
4:39
um for many of these people had is the
4:41
difference between a stable home and
4:43
life out on the streets but one major
4:45
problem that we talked about his lead
4:48
exposure and according to the most
4:50
recent HUD study 62,000 public housing
4:54
units nearly six percent of our total
4:56
public housing stock are in need of lead
4:59
abatement you are highly accomplished
5:02
dr. we spoke at length about the
5:05
implications of lead and lead poisoning
5:08
our children can I just ask you to
5:11
commit today that you will make sure
5:14
that HUD resources are dedicated to
5:17
dramatically reducing the number of
5:19
public housing units where LED is a
5:22
problem i can assure you that I will
5:26
very much be working with you on that
5:28
310,000 cases right now children each of
5:35
which cost us enormous amounts money i
5:37
don’t think people even calculate that
5:39
and to that when we’re talking about
5:41
so yes I will be very vigorous in that
5:44
area i I’ve airy much appreciate it
5:47
um this is a particular problem for us
5:50
in the northeast is a particular problem
5:51
in boston where housing stock is old
5:54
route and it is absolutely critical that
5:57
we get the lead out of these housing
6:00
units and that our children have a
6:01
chance to grow up without being injured
6:04
by our own negligence i look forward to
6:06
working with thank you for your
6:07
leadership and angry
6:08
thank you dr. Carson senator Heller
Send to Kindle

Tuesday Thoughts…

Yes it’s Tuesday and nearly Christmas.  The ground here is covered with snow and a white

Leading the 2001 Christmas Pageant of Peace pr...

Leading the 2001 Christmas Pageant of Peace program, President George W. Bush and Mrs. Laura Bush preside over the lighting ceremonies for the National Christmas Tree, a 40-foot Colorado blue spruce. White House photo by Susan Sterner. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Christmas is upon us.  Some thoughts as Christmas is upon us and the year is winding down.

The recent Presidential Election is now well in our rear view mirror and yesterday the designated electors from all 50 states voted and Donald J.Trump is now designated as our 45th President.  I’m hopeful that we, as a country can now begin to move forward into 2017.

That being said, I’m not so sure that moving forward is going to be so easily accomplished.  As I read news stories and postings on the profusion of social media sites I am both concerned, and confused.

There continues to be what appears to be a great deal of hate for the newly elected president.  Possibly not for him specifically and rather for the overall process which brought him to his newfound position.  I can only speak for myself in this matter, and back in 2008 and 2012 my choice for president didn’t win either year.  Those of my family and close friends while disappointed certainly didn’t display any of the outbursts which have been reported over the past few weeks.

No one went to the electoral college gathering in Colorado to shout furious rhetoric while acting like some whiny, bad-tempered child.  We were not pleased with the outcome of the vote and moved on.  We were wise enough to know that the Republican Party had not put forth a quality candidate.  Nor had that candidate connected with the voters.

Back to current events, the Republican candidate connected with his voting base and the Democrat, Hillary Clinton didn’t.  I’m certain that plenty of reviews and dissection of the 2016 Presidential Election will look at everything but how the candidate connected with their respective voters.

Now, six weeks after the election, there continue to be those statist democrats who are filled with and spew nothing but ungracious, scathing and vile sputum at one and all.  I’ll assert that this is a contributing basis for the divide in this country.  With the statist left continuing to act like the child who didn’t get their way, nothing will be resolved.  Time to man up Democrats.

Thanks for reading.  If you’d like to contribute to this website and our narrative here is a good and current PayPal link.

Send to Kindle

Update: Wisconsin Presidential Election Recount.

The Jill Stein and Hillary Clinton Election recount here in Wisconsin is on fire.

via GIPHY

Send to Kindle

Voting for Hillary?

Voting for Hillary?  Are you really?  I’m a horrible judge of character given your inability to make hillary-for-prisonreasonable judgments given the preponderance of facts of her guilt.

Please take a look at the following – IS HILLARY GUILTY?

It takes Bill Whittle 93 seconds to show Hillary Clinton guilty of violating three separate Federal Statutes. It takes another three minutes to explain why she and Obama simply DO NOT CARE.

Ok, I waited for the 4:52 for you to come back.  Bill is short and to the point.  Are you telling me that you’re still voting for Hillary, who has violated the espionage act and other federal statutes?  I thought you were smarter than that.

Now here is a bit longer video, 30 minutes of good facts – The Truth About The Hillary Clinton FBI Investigation and James Comey’s Announcement

Stefan Molyneux lays out with links, documented misdeeds, corruption and of course Hillary lies about just about everything surrounding the current election process.

Over the past month, I’ve seen many interesting posts.  These posts have been from individuals who are well known for their areas of expertise.  These are individuals whose postings I read for their musings and pontifications on a variety of subjects and are known and apparently well respected throughout the internet.

When it comes to their outlook and statements and writings about the current election, it becomes flagrantly obvious that these individuals haven’t a modicum of knowledge about the current political climate.  Now, everyone is entitled to their own opinions on anything.  I don’t necessarily have to agree with said individuals and I won’t.  I also ignore the trolls, not the Icelandic Christmas boys, who are at a complete loss to have a reasoned conversation about the political subject.

I do find it interesting that of the thousands of emails released documenting the multitude of violations and lies and corruption by Hillary and her menagerie, there has been no defense that any what has been brought to light is not true.

Tomorrow we get to go vote and all of the past 16 months of kerfuffle will be behind us.  I can certainly hope!  Let me know what you think, and please comment and contribute.

 

Send to Kindle

If you don’t want the FBI involved…

If you don’t want the FBI involved…

screenshot_2

Why is this concept so strange and challenging for the statist left to comprehend?

Continue to assist us in our journey to Fight Back against the statist media and their failing false narrative.

Send to Kindle

Warning to Hillary Clinton

Warning to Hillary Clinton, from WikiLeaks, the Podesta emails.

English: John Podesta in 2010.

English: John Podesta in 2010. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Warning to Hillary Clinton

Send to Kindle

Seven topics for discussion on a Saturday before the election.

Seven topics for discussion on a Saturday before the election.  Scanning the news this breaking-newsmorning these eight topics caught my eye.  Feel free to discuss amongst yourselves and comment below as you see fit.  And in no particular order lets get started.

Bloody October Pushes Chicago Past 600 Homicides.

 Wait, I thought Chicago was to be the poster city for all that was well and good with gun control?  Here is your real world example of how draconian gun laws impact the Second City and its residents.  And to add insult to injury, no one on the statist left gives a scintilla of acknowledgement to what is transpiring in Chicago.

Susan Sarandon explains why she’s not backing Hillary Clinton: ‘I don’t vote with my vagina’

I’m sure we’re all glad as it would make for a rather messy voting booth.

Democrats Don’t Have A Plan If Donald Trump Is Elected – BuzzFeed News

And we’re surprised about this why?  The statist democrats assume that Hillary Clinton (felon) will be summarily handed the presidency on November 8th and then coronated on the 20th of January 2017.  Now it is obvious that they are entirely consumed with Wikileaks 1-28 and the rest of the overflow of our ability to peek behind the curtain of what goes on and has gone on over the past years.  As I’ve previously written, why only two individuals have suffered any consequences from what we now know is baffling

Why Aren’t There More Gay Baseball Players?.

Given the historic nature of the recent end of the 2016 World Series,  this is the topic on the mind of those who follow baseball?  Ok, so it’s not any of the bizarre and lurid goings on of the soon to be wrapped up Presidential Election.

 Being a Journalism School graduate this is particularly disturbing.  Whatever happened to the 5 W’s and H that were taught when I was in class?  Journalism within the statist media has lost its way.
Pay for play, slush fund while working as a government employee?   There is so much wrong with this revelation that it is hard to know where to begin. Lets start with the fact that the gift was never reported as required.

The Case for and Against Daylight Saving Time.

It is that time of year once again to go through this exercise.  The sun will be up an hour earlier on Sunday and will set sometime in the middle of the afternoon.  I’ll excuse any lateness from anyone.

 

Send to Kindle

WIKILEAKS 1-25 BREAKING NEWS:

WIKILEAKS 1-25 BREAKING NEWS: Michelle Obama Deletes Clinton Tweets. DOJ Dinner With Podesta.  There is a great amount of resource information here.  A HT and shout out to H.A. Goodman.

Note that in the youtube.com link, H.A. Goodman provides lots of links and resources.

Continue to assist us to Fight Back.

Send to Kindle

6 Occurrences of Voter Fraud.

6 occurrences of Voter Fraud?  But wait, Paul, that’s not all that bad for a Presidential

English: A voter returns his vote-by-mail ball...

English: A voter returns his vote-by-mail ballot in the 2006 General elections in Lane County, Oregon. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

election.  Well, these are six occurrences reporting voter fraud across the country.  There are likely as many opinions about the need or lack of need for Voter ID as there are voters in the country.

Here in Wisconsin the requirements are –

Wisconsin
  1. 1 of 3
    In person
    By mail
    Who can vote by mail

    All voters registered in Wisconsin can vote by mail

    1. Get your absentee ballot application

    Download and print the absentee ballot application


    2. Fill out the form

    Step 1 · Provide your municipality and county

    Step 2 · Provide your name, birthday, and contact information

    Step 3 · Provide your address

    More

    3. Submit the form

    Mail the signed and completed form to your Municipal Clerk’s office so it’s received by 5 PM on Nov 3

    Attach a copy of accepted ID, if required

    4. Vote
    • Once you receive your ballot, follow the instructions to fill out the ballot and return envelope
    • Your ballot must be received by 8 PM on Election Day, Nov 8
    • Check the status of your ballot on myvote.wi.gov
    ID requirements

    Attach a copy to your mail ballot application or bring one of the following IDs with you to vote:

    • A Wisconsin DOT-issued driver license with photo (or without photo if you have a religious exemption)
    • A Wisconsin DOT-issued ID card with photo (or without photo if you have a religious exemption)
    • Military ID card
    • A US passport

    More

2 of 3

  • Live at a Wisconsin address by Oct 29
  • Be registered to vote in Wisconsin or register to vote at the polls on Election Day. Check if you’re registered to vote.
  • Be a US citizen

More

ID requirements

Attach a copy to your mail ballot application or bring one of the following IDs with you to vote:

  1. A Wisconsin DOT-issued driver license with photo (or without photo if you have a religious exemption)
  2. A Wisconsin DOT-issued ID card with photo (or without photo if you have a religious exemption)
  3. Military ID card
  4. A US passport

Many on the statist left continue to clamor that the requirement to show a photo ID when casting a vote in any election is unfair,suppressive of voters and racist.  Why you wouldn’t want to know who is voting and if they are a citizen and allowed to vote, is baffling to me.  Now, despite the statist left and their insistence of their being no voter fraud here are some recent occurrences.

These are but six instances reported by local news sources across the country.  How the statist left can continue to not be cognizant that there is voter fraud across the country is amazingly disingenuous.

It is instances such as these six that enroll us in the cause to continue to Fight Back against the statist media and their complicit  and coerced stories.

Send to Kindle

5 Reasons not to vote for Hillary.

5 reasons not to vote for Hillary, and your asking, wait, what, only five?  Yes, there are

English: Ballot Box showing preferential voting

English: Ballot Box showing preferential voting (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

numerous more than five reasons and these are five I’ve observed.

  1.  The sale of U.S uranium reserves.  While Secretary of State, Hillary allowed the sale, and also benefited from this transaction with a $2.35 million dollar donation to the Clinton Foundation.  Where has the statist media been to cover this story and urge for a special prosecutor?
  2. Benghazi.  Unless you’ve been in a coma or living under a rock during the past four years we’ve all seen the infamous,  …”what difference does it make.” video. Really Hillary?  Four American citizens, including our, Ambassador, were attacked and died on your watch as Secretary of State.  You have little if any respect for your fellow Americans lives. You then compounded the issue by lying to the American people and the families of the dead heroes as to the reasons for the incident.
  3. The Clinton Foundation.  While sounding noble and for the common good, it is nothing of the sort.  Many charities/foundations often contribute 80% or more of their expenses/donations to their causes, The Clinton Foundation in 2014 contributed an astounding 5.7% of their expenses/donations to charitable grants.  These minuscule contributions to charitable causes have many shouting swindle.  The axiom of, follow the money, is relevant here.
  4. Bill Clinton.  There are current voters of a certain age who don’t know of, or have failed to pay attention to Hillary’s husband.  These folks have no memory of the Clinton (Bill) years in the White House.  To state the obvious that Bill is a serial philanderer and rapist is likely being kind.  Are we so calloused as to want someone of his ilk returning to the White House?
  5. Violation of the Espionage Act.  There are an abundance and preponderance of verified evidence that Hillary violated 18 U.S.C. 793 – GATHERING, TRANSMITTING OR LOSING DEFENSE INFORMATION.  In conjunction with this, her lying to congress and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are cause to have her in prison.

While this is by no means a complete list, it is a list of things that are unrefutable.  Hillary has no business being anywhere near the White House.  She also has absolutely disqualified herself from running for the office of President.  It is instances such as these five that enroll us in the cause to continue to Fight Back against the statist media and their complicit  and coerced stories.

Send to Kindle
Show Buttons
Hide Buttons